14 October 2012
Dear Phyllis,
You have no idea what a major figure
you are in my life. There is nothing in life that I enjoy more than
preaching, but my life has been reduced to a congregation of one. You
are virtually the only outlet that I have. Pastor Kichikun has been
gracious in sharing his pulpit with me one Sunday a month. But three
weeks ago I told him that I was no longer qualified to stand before
the people in church and share the Word of God. This is because of my
disqualification in my domestic life. When Rosemary made her fatal
decision, I said, “This is the end for me.” One the basis of the
pastoral epistles, I was no longer qualified to be a deacon, elder,
or leader in a church. Because of that, I went into a self-imposed
recluse for four years declining to share the Word even in a home
meeting. But then in Russia, I was confronted with the decision of
giving the Gospel to thousands who had been in 70 years of darkness
under communism, or remain silent. I felt simply to be a witness of
the salvation of Christ demanded that I step up to share that truth.
Since then I have not declined any request to speak publicly. But
three weeks ago a relatively minor incident caused me to reexamine my
qualification to speak in church, and told Kichikun to take me off
the preaching roster.
The problem was Pammy. Basically she is
good – but not perfect. That week she pulled a couple of stunts
that I thought were dishonoring to the Lord. One was refusing to go
to school with me to interpret because of illness. But two hours
later she had a miracle healing when a friend showed up and asked her
to go shopping. The second was when she was gone all day and got home
at 9:00 o'clock at night. She did call twice to tell me where she
was, and shouldn't be held too accountable as she was with another
lady in the other lady's car. She got struck until that woman was
ready to go home. I felt she should have gotten out of the car and
taken a taxi home.
Perhaps a more serious disqualification
is my warm temper. I have a relatively short fuse and a considerable
amount of explosives when they gets detonated. There is a rice field
next to my shop, and no walls on my shop. When things go bad in the
shop, occasionally there are various objects seen arcing though the
air as I throw them out in the rice field. My dear friend Dave Moore
has frequently spoken to me about self-control. He has reminded me
that basically this is a decision whether or not I want the Lord to
change me and fill me more with is Holy Spirit that I might have more
self-control. This is one of the fruits of the Spirit,. And to be too
hot headed is a proof that Jesus does not have full control of my
life.
There I have a problem. This is a great
mystery to me. Nor is it one that I alone struggle with. I would say
that nearly all Christians have something in their lives that they
would like to improve, but still come up short. I am not proud of my
short temper, but it is something that still plagues me. Titus 1:7
tells us that “a bishop must not be self-willed or soon angry”.
One brother told me, “You are not a bishop, so why worry about your
temper?” But Kichikun has told me that the Thais – like the
Japanese – are very sensitive about showing emotion like that.
Exploding is a very poor testimony. I know that I am a poor example
of Christ and feel that perhaps I should step down from a public
ministry. This being true, I am reduced to a congregation of one that
I write to each week.
This past week I had a very serious
talk with the Lord about my son Dave. As you know, he has walked the
wrong road for over 20 years. He is the biggest grief of my life. My
question to Jesus was, “What happened to dedication?” He was
dedicated to serve the Lord from before birth. We never had any other
aspiration for him than he become a credit to Christ and be used to
advance the Kingdom. If a child doesn't serve the Lord, what good are
they? Why have children if that is only to be a disgrace to the Name
of Christ, and increase the population of hell? We all know that not
all PKs (preacher's kids) and MK's (missionary kid) turn out well. I
have known several MKs that have been bums and crooks. I didn't want
my boy to be one. Years ago they used to have a destruct button on
rockets. If a large rocket went off course, they could destroy it
before it went the wrong way and endanger American cities. I used to
pray that if Dave ever veered from serving the Lord that the Lord
would take him rather than leave him here to dishonor His Name. Dave
went off course, and the Lord did not push the destruct button.
But a more serous question is what
happened to dedication. If the Lord will not accept that which we
dedicate to Him, why dedicate it? Cain offered a sacrifice to the
Lord that was unacceptable. Okay. That is understandable. I have had
people offer things to me that I didn't want. One time a man gave me
a case of beer. That all went in the toilet. History is full of the
stories of outstanding men of God who were dedicated to the Lord by
godly mothers – Samuel, Hudson Taylor, John Wesley, etc. – and
the Lord used them.
I am not discounting the possibility
that the Lord may yet lay His hand on Dave, and he might become a
Franklin Graham – who was a prodigal son and an embarrassment to
his dad for 40 years. This, of course, is my prayer. But if the Lord
does not do something like that, and Dave spends a lifetime as a
dishonor to the Name of Christ; that can only mean that I dedicated
a case of beer to the Lord that he refused to accept. If we dedicate
infants to Christ only to see them become flag carriers for the
devil, that means that dedication is meaningless.
Yes, I know the argument about free
will. A parent can't make a decision for a child. John 1:13 tells us
of three things that simply do not apply to those who are born sons
of God – blood, the will of the flesh, and the will
of man. The “blood” means ancestral salvation. God doesn't
have any grandchildren. He only has direct children. No one is saved
because mom and dad were. The will of the flesh means willing
yourself into the Kingdom of God. You can will to be saved as hard as
you like, but if God doesn't will it you ain't gonna be saved.
Thirdly, I can't will somebody else into the Kingdom. If they don't
want it, my will doesn't apply. Obviously this applies to children
being saved.
I also know that child dedication is
really not dedicating the child to the Lord, but the parents are
dedicating themselves to raising that child the right way. It is
parental dedication, not child dedication. But if there is no such
thing as a real transaction with God of giving a child to the Lord
and His accepting that child, then child dedication is pointless. I
really don't want to believe that. Hudson Taylor's mother was
serious when she prayed for her son to become a missionary. God
obviously heard her prayer and wonderfully answered it.
This whole issue of dedication is a
mystery to me. Perhaps I am wrong, but my idea of dedication is
giving something to someone, and they accepting it. If that is true,
then the object given is no longer the former owner's. It is the
property of the one who accepts it. Why is it that the things we
dedicate to the Lord so easily slip out of His hands? Paul firmly
declared, “For I know Whom I have believed, and am persuaded that
He is able to keep that which I have committed unto Him against that
day” (2 Tim. 1:12). Oh, I like that! But I am not falling asleep on
that. I didn't dedicate myself to the Lord 55 years ago and left it
at that. I plead with the Lord every morning to take me. Oh if only I
could be more dedicated! DL Moody said, “The world has yet to see
what God can do with a man who is totally dedicated to Him. By God's
grace I want to be that man.” The Lord certainly used DL Moody. I
have no false illusion that I will be a DL Moody. But if only I could
only be the most dedicated man to wash the dishes for His servants,
that would be my greatest honor.
There is no question that the greatest
problem in the church, world wide, today is defective dedication. I
detest that “sensei” mentality in Japan. Very clearly there are
two categories of Christians in Japan – class A and class B. Class
A Christians are the kesshinshas (dedicated) and Class B are the ones
who aren't. To be a kesshinsha you have to go to Bible school, and
then you become a sensei. The rank and file of the rest are the lower
ones in the pews. Where, pray tell, in the Bible does it say that if
I sit in the pew I am exempted from being as dedicated as the man
standing in the pulpit? I believe that the pew should be every bit as
dedicated as the pulpit. And I often wonder about the sensei standing
in the pulpit – what is he dedicated to? To serving the Lord or
dedicated to promoting his own agenda?
I looked around church this morning and
wondered how dedicated everyone was. If they are not dedicated to the
Lord, why not? My goodness, if we considered salvation as optional
and unimportant as dedication, I wonder who would be saved? As I
looked at those folks this morning I thought of the wedding vow.
Basically that is what salvation is – being married to Jesus. When
a couple stand in the front of a church to exchange wedding vows,
they are dedicating themselves to giving up their lives and living
henceforth for the sake of the other. If this is not the wedding vow,
then the wedding is a mockery. Everyone wants the other partner to
fulfill their vow but few people have any intention of doing what
they promised. I fear salvation is greatly like that. We want Jesus
to keep His side of the bargain, but have little expectation of
keeping our word.
The story was told, at the Keswick
Conference in England many years ago, of a train in Scotland. There
was a bridge that the train went over that was supposed to have a
lucky river. Everyday, when the train went over that bridge, all the
passengers would open the windows and threw a coin in the river.
There was a man who commuted daily over that bridge and he couldn't
afford to throw a coin in every day. So he took a small coin, drilled
a hole in it, and tied it to a string. When the train went over the
bridge and everyone threw in their coins, he would take out his coin,
and toss it out the window with the crowd. Then he would wind up the
string and pull it back in. One day he threw his coin out the window,
but the string broke. The speaker said, “Many of you folks are like
that man in Scotland. You come to these conferences, and go forward
to make your dedication to the Lord. But then you go back home and
pull your coin back to put it in your pocket. Praise God for the day
when the sting breaks.”
N o doubt that is exactly what is wrong
with a lot of dedication. Statics show that, of the thousands who go
forward to dedicated themselves to be a missionary at Urbana type
missionary conferences, only a very small percentage ever make it to
the field. There is noting wrong with the Lord changing the direction
of the path for many who dedicate themselves to a certain field. But
whether we go or stay, our dedication should be absolute.
Lev. 21:17-21 spells out the
disqualifying features of any of the seed of Aaron who was to be
dedicated to the Lord. The blind and anyone with a blemish could not
be dedicated to the Lord as a priest. As I have read that, I have
thought to myself, “Well, that leaves me out.” When I consider
the terrible dings and blemishes on me, I feel it is insulting to
offer myself to Jesus for His service. Let the Lord lay His hand on
those who are more qualified, and I am grateful if I can only have a
broom to sweep the barn for the Lord.
I love to preach. God has given me a
message that burns in my heart. But at this point it looks like I
have a congregation of one when I write to you each week, Phyllis. It
is a privilege to be a street sweeper for Jesus. Lets do it to the
best of our ability that he might be glorified.
bill
No comments:
Post a Comment